geographical position shift made the dumping ground of
the worst type of
brack-cantor from China
I it reple that
the E. Jr. is strough anse undesirables & Hang King when the deportation of undesirables
other course is open & that it is not cleave way
am
such persues
caust ho um marat
cases sent straight
6.
k their homes.
·
there
In any further communica tion on this subject, please quote
No. 18545.
and address***
The Under-Secretary of State,
Foreigu Office,
London.
Where
Cases
There may of comme direct shipment is impossible
the Eos be little doubt that the fork
EM
provided dae mustice is given in advance,
of Stang King wild & math to assist, by rector forwarding
repaid & Consular deporties, all expenses king of course fund.
Suggest that the muster in China sad As morgenas come I-Jame
for the treatment
endeavour I same arrangement with Hangking
such exceptional
to Article 84. in so for
it solates
natives of the colony
( The Imbeciles Ord. was passed before the amended
* as
therofore neces-
0. in C. of 04 and amendment
sary. The Vagrancy Ord. was subsequent to the amended
0. in C., and under that order there could be no
occasion for putting the Ord. into force against
deportees from China. The point may therefore be
passed over I think ).
? proceed as proposed.
I age generally, his I at consult for For before replying (tilling P.0. Chat we andoring so) + putting A & him for his drones.
John
Pts. 1977 C.Pd.
+
at
517:-
D).
23938
the 3 JUL 06
FOREIGN OFFICE
July 2
•
1906.
472
I am directed by Secretary Sir E. Grey to state
for the information of the Earl of Elgin that the
draft of a China and Corea Order in Council to amend
the China and Corea Order in Council 1904 is now in
course of preparation.
The Judge of His Majesty's Supreme Court for China and Corea (Sir Havilland W. de Sausmarez) who
has been consulted in the matter is of opinion that
Article 84 of the 1904 Order in Council dealing with
the deportation of persons to Hongkong is useless if
the decision of the Hongkong Government not to receive such persons is adhered to.
In his opinion it is unfortunate that the British
authorities in China with the small provision they
have in the minor ports to enforce order should not,
Under Secretary of State, Colonial Office.
be
Page 480
Page 481
geographical position shift made the dumping ground of
the worst type of
brack-cantor from China
I it reple that
черв
the E. Jr. is strough anse undesirables & Hang King when the deportation of undesirables
other course is open & that it is not cleave way
am
such persues
caust ho um marat
cases sent straight
6.
معها
k their homes.
·
there
In any further communica tion on this subject, please quote
No. 18545.
and address***
The Under-Secretary of State,
Foreigu Office,
London.
Where
Cases
There may of comme direct shipment is impossible
the Eos be little doubt that the fork
EM
provided dae mustice is given in advance,
of Stang King wild & math to assist, by rector forwarding
repaid & Consular deporties, all expenses king of course fund.
Suggest that the muster in China sad As morgenas come I-Jame
for the treatment
སང་
come to for:
endeavour I same arrangement with Hangking
such exceptional
to Article 84. in so for
it solates
natives of the colony
( The Imbeciles Ord. was passed before the amended
* as
therofore neces-
0. in C. of 04 and amendment
sary. The Vagrancy Ord. was subsequent to the amended
0. in C., and under that order there could be no
occasion for putting the Ord. into force against
deportees from China. The point may therefore be
passed over I think ).
? proceed as proposed.
sec
10
I age generally, his I at consult for For before replying (tilling P.0. Chat we andoring so) + putting A & him for his drones.
Любите
John
Pts. 1977 C.Pd.
+
at
517:-
D).
23938
the 3 JUL 06
FOREIGN OFFICE
July 2
•
1906.
472
I am directed by Secretary Sir E. Grey to state
for the information of the Earl of Elgin that the
draft of a China and Corea Order in Council to amend
the China and Corea Order in Council 1904 is now in
course of preparation.
The Judge of His Majesty's Supreme Court for China and Corea (Sir Havilland W. de Sausmarez) who
has been consulted in the matter is of opinion that
Article 84 of the 1904 Order in Council dealing with
the deportation of persons to Hongkong is useless if
the decision of the Hongkong Government not to receive such persons is adhered to.
In his opinion it is unfortunate that the British
authorities in China with the small provision they
have in the minor ports to enforce order should not,
Under Secretary of State, Colonial Office.
be
Page 480Page 481
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.